Pabai Pabai & Guy Paul Kabai v. Commonwealth of Australia
Jurisdiction: Federal Court of Australia, Victoria Registry
Side A: Pabai Pabai (Individual)
Side A: Guy Paul Kabai (Individual)
Side B: Australia (Government)
Core objectives: Whether the Australian government has breached a duty of care to the Torres Strait Islanders in failing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
SummaryOn October 22, 2021, Wadhuam Paul and Wadhuam Pabai, First Nations’ leaders from the Gudamalulgal nation of the Torres Strait Islands, filed a case challenging Australia’s failure to cut emissions and asserting that the government’s inaction will force their communities to to migrate to new areas.
The plaintiffs present scientific evidence proving that the following climate change-induced impacts already threaten their native title rights and Ailan Kastom, the Torres Strait people's distinctive customary culture: (i) higher temperature, (ii) ocean acidification and higher ocean temperature, (iii) sea-level rise and associated flooding and erosion, (iv) increase in the frequency, size and/or intensity of extreme weather events such as terrestrial and marine heatwaves, severe storms, and flooding, (v) harm and destruction of terrestrial and marine ecosystems and non-human species - coral reefs, and (vi) harm to human health. A continued failure to act will result in the triggering of so-called tipping points making the Torres Strait becoming uninhabitable.
Australia is a major global GHG emitter and its federal policies have thus far failed to set the country to a decarbonisation pathway in line with what the plaintiffs call the "best available science target" and the advise of the Australian Climate Change Authority, an independent body. It is also currently not on track to meet its own 2030 target. It has built seawalls in the Torres Strait but they have proven unsuccessful. The plaintiffs allege that Australia increased their people's vulnerability.
The applicants allege that the Commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them, their culture and traditional way of life, and their environment from harms caused by climate change, and that the government has breached this duty as the targets are not consistent with the best available science. Pursuant to the Torres Strait Treaty, Australia is indeed require to take legislative and other action to protect and preserve the marine environment in and in the vicinity of the protected zone, and/or take measures for the prevention and control of pollution or other damage to the marine environment from all sources and activities under its jurisdiction or control. The plaintiffs seek an order requiring the federal government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prevent the inundation of islands in the Torres Strait through the implementation of necessary measures to protect their land and marine environment, cultural and customary rights. The case relies on the duty to care as recognized by Australian courts in Sharma vs Minister for the Environment.