Ewan McGaughey et al v Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited
Jurisdiction: High Court
Side A: Ewan McGaughey and Neil Davies (Individual)
Side B: Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited (Corporation)
Core objectives: Whether a failure to develop a plan to divest from fossil fuels was a breach of directors duties or fiduciary duties by the directors of a UK pension fund
SummaryOn 29 October 2021 Dr Neil Davies, Dr Ewan McGaughey and others issues proceedings in the UK High Court against the directors of the University Superannuation Scheme (USS), a private pension scheme for academic staff in the UK and the largest private pension scheme in the UK. The case is a derivative claim against the directors on the basis of the directors duty to act in the beneficiaries best interest, based on the directors duties under the Companies Act 2006 and/or fiduciary duties. Alongside a number of other issues relating to the administration of the scheme, the claimants arguments argue that fossil fuels have been the worst performing asset class since 2017 and that "the failure of the current and former directors including a shadow director of the Company to create a credible plan for disinvestment from fossil fuel investments (as defined below) has prejudiced and will continue to prejudice the success of the Company." The scheme's level of investment in fossil fuels is assumed for the purposes of the claim to be in excess of £1 billion.
On 4th May 2021, the USS announced an ambition to become net zero for carbon by 2050. However, according to the claimants the company has no credible plan for achieving this goal and no credible assessment of the financial risk to the company posed by climate change has been provided. They also argue that the claimants duties should be interpreted in line with Articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, respectively the right to life and the right to a private and family life. They argue that the only rational way for the Directors to discharge their duties in light of the Paris Agreement and its impacts, as well as the wishes of the beneficiaries, and the long term interests of the company, is to devise and implement an immediate plan for fossil fuel divestment.
On the February 28, 2022, a decision granting permission to proceed to full hearing was handed down from the UK High Court. A new hearing date was decided for March 28, 2022, 4 days before the scheduled pension cuts. A new hearing date was decided for the 28th of March 2022, 4 days before the scheduled pension cuts.
- To bring a claim on a derivative basis, sufficient interest and evidence of a loss suffered by the company and subsequently by the claimants must be shown. The claimants could not demonstrate this.