At issue: Claimants challenged mining project, arguing that environmental assessment failed to consider climate impacts to human rights and environment.
At issue: Whether the oil drilling license obtained by ReconAfrica from the Namibian Government is legal with regard to exacerbating climate change in a region especially prone to droughts and endangerment of wildlife, as well as the duty to consult local communities.
At issue: Whether the implementation plan for the NDC provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether the South Korean NDC provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether the climate law provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether the greenhouse gas emitting activities of New Zealand’s largest emitters amount to violations of common law duties under public nuisance, negligence, and a novel climate tort.
At issue: Whether Norway has violated the fundamental rights of Norwegian citizens and lower legislation through the adoption of three decisions concerning the plans for development and operation of petroleum (oil and gas) deposits in the North Sea by failing to include Scope 3 emissions in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
At issue: Whether Kia Motors México could be sanctioned for non-compliance with the NOM-163-SEMARNAT-ENER-SCFI-2013, under the standards of the right to a healthy environment
At issue: Whether the defendant energy company has engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in its public statements concerning its greenhouse gas emission policies