At issue: Whether the offence of conspiracy to cause public nuisance had been committed in relation to the flying of drones in Heathrow Airport's 'no fly zone'
At issue: Violation of legal duty of care by the ING Bank due to lacking climate action in relation climate policies, financing and services, including scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.
At issue: Whether the Netherlands is legally obliged to take more stringent climate mitigation and adaptation action to protect inhabitants of the Dutch Island of Bonaire.
At issue: Balancing the interplay between safeguarding biodiversity by preservation of the Great Indian Bustard and mitigating the impacts of climate change through interpretation of Indian Constitutional Provisions and other legal framework in India and international commitments.
At issue: If Repsol, a major fossil fuel company is in breach of the General Advertising Law for greenwashing strategy and of unlawful competition based on this greenwashing strategy.
Note that following this claim submitted before the Commercial Court, environmental and consumer NGOs and associations have submitted claims before the Regulatory Authority (National Commission for Markets and Competition) highlighting the contribution of Repsol to climate change and accusing Repsol of a greenwashing strategy.
At issue: Whether the granting of gas licences had taken adequate consideration of climate change and in particular the need to transition away from fossil fuels.
At issue: The question is whether the government's alleged failure to show with a sufficient level of specificity that the Climate Action Plan 2023 (CAP 23) and its Annex of Actions will reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with Ireland’s legally binding carbon budget is a breach of the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2015 (as amended).
At issue: Whether an advertising claim by an airline that passengers could explore the world with “Total Peace Of Mind”, alongside the phrase “Environmental Advocacy”, was likely to mislead consumers.